Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.7 | 28.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2004-01-15 |
| 3.25 x 1.76 x 0.89 inches | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| $ 220.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | 12,29 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6620 has an overall score of 28.2, which is a little bit better than BenQ A520's 25.7 score. Nokia 6620's body is way heavier and just a little thicker than BenQ A520. Nokia 6620 has a screen that's very similar to the BenQ A520 one, although the Nokia 6620 also has a much better 208 x 176 resolution.
The Nokia 6620 has a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in BenQ A520, both of them have 0 cores. Nokia 6620 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than BenQ A520, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 32 GB.
Nokia 6620 has a camera that's very similar to BenQ A520's camera, both of them have a same resolution camera in the back. Nokia 6620 has improved battery performance than BenQ A520, because it has an 850mAh battery size.
The Nokia 6620 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.