Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.7 | 27.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-01-05 |
| 3.25 x 1.76 x 0.89 inches | 4.17 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| $ 220.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6822 is a bit better than BenQ A520, getting a 27.6 score against 25.7. The Nokia 6822 is a a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier cellphone than the BenQ A520. Nokia 6822 features a display that's very similar to the display in BenQ A520, they have the same resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 6822 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than BenQ A520, because it has 3,58 MB internal storage. The Nokia 6822 has a processor that's just as good as BenQ A520's processing unit, both have 0 cores. The Nokia 6822's camera is very similar to the BenQ A520 one, both have the same resolution back-facing camera.
Nokia 6822 features longer battery lifetime than BenQ A520, because it has 850mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 6822 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.