Search


Compare phones

Global Score
21.957.2
Basic Information
BenqSamsung
--Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1
--2010-06-18
4.80 x 1.97 x 0.80 inches4.78 x 2.50 x 0.39 inches
3.60 ounces4.50 ounces
$ 85.00$ 85.00
Display / Screen
--4 inches
98 x 64 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
--Super AMOLED
--233 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.87.6
Performance
--Samsung Exynos 3 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor
--512 MB RAM
GPUPowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU
5.767.47
Storage
--16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
05.72
Camera
--5.00 MP
--1280 x 720 (29 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.27
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.13.3
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
125 hours standby time
2 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
5.8 hours talk time
2.083.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Captivate is much better than BenQ C220, getting a 57.2 score against 21.9. Samsung Captivate's body is much thinner but much heavier than the BenQ C220. Samsung Captivate features a way better screen than BenQ C220, because it has a way higher 800 x 480 pixels resolution. Samsung Captivate has a really superior hardware performance than BenQ C220, because it has an extra graphics processing unit and more cores.

The Samsung Captivate counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than BenQ C220, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB. Samsung Captivate takes much clearer photographs and videos than BenQ C220. The Samsung Captivate counts with a much better battery duration than BenQ C220, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 700mAh.

Samsung Captivate costs the same than the BenQ C220, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.