Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | LG |
| -- | 2005-03-14 |
| 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 3.53 x 1.76 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.03 ounces | 3.35 ounces |
| $ 525.00 | $ 200.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.08 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 142 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 165 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.56 |
Comparison review
LG PM-225 is a bit better than BenQ M300, getting a overall score of 28.6 against 26. The LG PM-225 is a just a little bit heavier and way thicker device than the BenQ M300. LG PM-225 and BenQ M300 have similar screens, although the LG PM-225 also has a slightly better resolution of 160 x 128px. LG PM-225 and BenQ M300 both have very similar CPUs, both of them have 0 processing cores.
LG PM-225 and BenQ M300 feature incredibly similar storage capacity for applications and games. The LG PM-225 captures better videos and photos than BenQ M300, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels. The LG PM-225 features superior battery life than BenQ M300, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 760mAh.
The LG PM-225 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.