Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26 | 28.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-02-12 |
| 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.03 ounces | 2.75 ounces |
| $ 525.00 | $ 129.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| -- | 79 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 1,02 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | -- |
| 3.08 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 142 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 10.9 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.32 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W205 has a general score of 28.1, which is a bit better than the BenQ M300's 26 score. The Motorola W205 construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than BenQ M300. The Motorola W205 features a much sharper screen than BenQ M300. Both have the same exact 128 x 128 resolution.
BenQ M300 and Motorola W205 both feature very similar processing units, they have 0 cores. The BenQ M300 takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola W205. Motorola W205 has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than BenQ M300. The Motorola W205 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than BenQ M300, because it has a 12% bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola W205 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.