Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26 | 28.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2004-01-15 |
| 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.03 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| $ 525.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 12,29 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.08 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 142 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6620 is just a bit better than BenQ M300, getting a global score of 28.2 against 26. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Nokia 6620 is a incredibly thicker and a lot heavier device than BenQ M300. Nokia 6620 has a display that's just as good as BenQ M300's display, although the Nokia 6620 also has a way better 208 x 176 pixels resolution.
Nokia 6620 has a much greater memory for games and applications than BenQ M300, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 32 GB. BenQ M300 and Nokia 6620 count with extremely similar CPUs, both of them have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 6620 features just a little bit longer battery performance than BenQ M300, because it has an 850mAh battery size instead of 760mAh.
The Nokia 6620 features a superior camera than BenQ M300, because it has a much better 0.3 MP resolution back camera.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia 6620 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.