Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26 | 28.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0s |
| -- | 2004-09-28 |
| 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 4.27 x 2.08 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.03 ounces | 4.16 ounces |
| $ 525.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8,19 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 1.00 MP |
| 3.08 | 4.29 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 142 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6670 has a general score of 28.4, which is slightly better than the BenQ M300's overall score of 26. The Nokia 6670 is a way heavier and thicker cellphone than the BenQ M300. The Nokia 6670 and BenQ M300 count with extremely similar processors, both have a 0-Core CPU. The BenQ M300 and the Nokia 6670 have really similar screens, although the Nokia 6670 also has a way higher 208 x 176 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 6670 features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than BenQ M300. The Nokia 6670 counts with a lot better camera than BenQ M300, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 1 mega pixels resolution. The Nokia 6670 counts with better battery lifetime than BenQ M300, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
The Nokia 6670 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.