Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.734.7
Basic Information
BenqNokia
Windows Mobile Professional 2003 SE--
--2009-09-02
4.72 x 2.36 x 0.78 inches3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches
5.29 ounces3.63 ounces
$ 619.00$ 135.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.76.1
Intel PXA270 (Single-Core 416 MHz) processor processor
64 MB RAM64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
6.395.76
Storage
--47,1 MB internal memory
MMC, SD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
01.16
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.06
Networks
Wi-Fi--
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
2.60.3
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
100 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
380 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
1.362.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Nokia X3 is a bit better than BenQ P50, getting a 34.7 score against 31.7. The Nokia X3 is a extremely lighter and notably thinner device than BenQ P50. BenQ P50 has a superior processing power than Nokia X3, and although they both have 64 MB of RAM memory, the BenQ P50 also has more cpu cores. Nokia X3 has a way better looking display than BenQ P50. Both have the same exact 320 x 240 pixels resolution.

The Nokia X3 features a superior camera than BenQ P50, because it has a back camera with a lot higher 3.2 MP resolution. The Nokia X3 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than BenQ P50. Nokia X3 counts with a superior battery lifetime than BenQ P50.

In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia X3 is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.