Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.8 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.23 x 1.61 x 0.83 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 169.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 6,14 MB internal memory | -- |
| miniSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | -- |
| 352 x 288 video resolution | -- |
| 4.51 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W230 is a bit better than BenQ S700, with a overall score of 28.8 against 26.8. The Motorola W230 is a much thinner and lighter phone than BenQ S700. The BenQ S700 and the Motorola W230 have extremely similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cores. Motorola W230 counts with a way better looking display than BenQ S700, although it has a quite lower 128 x 128 pixels resolution.
BenQ S700 features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola W230, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. The Motorola W230 has a very superior battery performance than BenQ S700, because it has a 57% more battery capacity. The BenQ S700 counts with a way better camera than Motorola W230.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola W230 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.