Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| BENQ Siemens | Samsung |
| 2006-03-08 | 2008-09-02 |
| 4.09 x 1.83 x 0.69 inches | 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 2.70 ounces |
| $ 795.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 132 x 176 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 23,55 MB internal memory | -- |
| RS-MMC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.62 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 4.4 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M320 has an overall score of 31.4, which is a bit better than Benq-Siemens C81's 28.6 general score. Even though Samsung SPH-M320 is a bit thicker than Benq-Siemens C81, it's lighter and also way newer. Samsung SPH-M320's processor is just as good as the processor in Benq-Siemens C81, they have the same number of cores.
The Benq-Siemens C81 features a slightly better display than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a slightly higher 176 x 132 resolution. Benq-Siemens C81 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Benq-Siemens C81 captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung SPH-M320 counts with longer battery performance than Benq-Siemens C81, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung SPH-M320 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.