Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is much better than BlackBerry DTEK60, having a overall score of 78.8 against 71.5. The Google Pixel 3a body is much newer and lighter than BlackBerry DTEK60's, but it is thicker. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit superior CPU than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has 4 more processing cores. The BlackBerry DTEK60 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
BlackBerry DTEK60 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a's battery performance is very similar to the BlackBerry DTEK60 one.
The BlackBerry DTEK60 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the BlackBerry DTEK60 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.