Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than BlackBerry DTEK60, with a overall score of 81.9 against 71.5. Google Pixel 4's body is notably newer and just a little lighter than the BlackBerry DTEK60's, although it's also thicker. Google Pixel 4 has just a little better hardware performance than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
BlackBerry DTEK60 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The BlackBerry DTEK60 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the BlackBerry DTEK60 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 21 mega-pixels resolution.
BlackBerry DTEK60 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The BlackBerry DTEK60 has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.