Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-25 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than BlackBerry DTEK60, getting a score of 75.8 against 71.5. Both of these phones include Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version while BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow, so it gives lots of additional features. Even though the nubia Red Magic 3S is incredibly newer than BlackBerry DTEK60, it is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a better processing unit than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. BlackBerry DTEK60 features a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photographs and videos than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better memory for apps and games than BlackBerry DTEK60, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior battery lifetime than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S costs more money than the BlackBerry DTEK60, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.