Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than the BlackBerry DTEK60's 71.5 global score. Galaxy A50's body is noticeably newer than BlackBerry DTEK60's, although it's a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a little better performance than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a greater number of cores.
BlackBerry DTEK60 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better camera than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A50 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than BlackBerry DTEK60, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features better battery life than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.