Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Glass and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than the BlackBerry DTEK60, with a global score of 80.1 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is much newer than BlackBerry DTEK60's, although it's extremely thicker and much heavier. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper display than BlackBerry DTEK60, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little bit better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing power than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of cores.
BlackBerry DTEK60 has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The BlackBerry DTEK60 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery lifetime than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than BlackBerry DTEK60, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the BlackBerry DTEK60. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the BlackBerry DTEK60, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.