Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Glass and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the BlackBerry DTEK60, with an 81 score against 71.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than the BlackBerry DTEK60, it is notably heavier and extremely thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processing power than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more cores. The BlackBerry DTEK60 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher count of pixels per display inch.
BlackBerry DTEK60 features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery performance than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The BlackBerry DTEK60 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with less MP and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.