Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-25 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is much better than the BlackBerry DTEK60's 71.5 score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much newer than BlackBerry DTEK60, it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better performance than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The BlackBerry DTEK60 has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The BlackBerry DTEK60 has a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery performance than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than BlackBerry DTEK60, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot better resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.