Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Samsung |
| 2018-07-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1620 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 433 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than BlackBerry KEY2, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 75.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 and the BlackBerry KEY2 were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A50's design is a bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier than the BlackBerry KEY2.
The BlackBerry KEY2 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1620 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A50 and BlackBerry KEY2 count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than BlackBerry KEY2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better battery duration than BlackBerry KEY2, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than BlackBerry KEY2, and although they both have a 0.36 inches sensor, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.