Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.96 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.34 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and Red | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1620 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 433 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than the BlackBerry KEY2's score of 75.4. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is newer than the BlackBerry KEY2's, but it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The BlackBerry KEY2 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1620px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The BlackBerry KEY2 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a processing unit that's just as good as the BlackBerry KEY2 one, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery duration than BlackBerry KEY2, because it has a 16 percent more battery size. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than BlackBerry KEY2, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.