Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is way better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, getting a general score of 88.1 against 71.8. Apple iPhone X's construction is way lighter and way thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Apple iPhone X has a better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit better display density.
The iPhone X counts with a quite better hardware performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone X counts with as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Blackview BL6000 Pro, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 94% greater battery capacity. The iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.