Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, with an 82 score against 71.8. The iPhone XR design is notably lighter and much thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. The iPhone XR features a slightly better looking display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a quite lower screen pixels density.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone XR counts with a greater processing power than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a way better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XR takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.