Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's overall score of 71.8. Google Pixel 3's body is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density. Blackview BL6000 Pro features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has an 81 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.