Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, having a global score of 80.7 against 71.8. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster CPU than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density. Blackview BL6000 Pro has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 54% more battery size. The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.