Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 71.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version. Google Pixel 3a's design is a lot thinner and notably lighter than the Blackview BL6000 Pro.
The Google Pixel 3a has a bit better looking display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density. The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 76 percent more battery capacity.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.