Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and better performance. Google Pixel 3a XL is a notably thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Blackview BL6000 Pro.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Blackview BL6000 Pro has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has more RAM.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Blackview BL6000 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.