Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, with an 81.9 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 4's construction is notably lighter and thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Blackview BL6000 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.