Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's score of 71.8. The Google Pixel 4a construction is lighter and way thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features.
Google Pixel 4a has just a little better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit sharper display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit greater pixel amount in each screen inch.
Blackview BL6000 Pro has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera. Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 68% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.