Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is way better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, having a general score of 89 against 71.8. Google Pixel 5's design is noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better processing power than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more vivid display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels count in each inch of display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. Blackview BL6000 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.