Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's overall score of 71.8. The HTC One M9 is a extremely thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10.
HTC One M9 features a little better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. The HTC One M9 features a brighter display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 video quality.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.