Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has an overall score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 overall score. HTC U11's construction is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. The HTC U11 counts with a little faster CPU than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The HTC U11 features a little bit better display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The HTC U11 features a camera that is very similar to the Blackview BL6000 Pro one, although the HTC U11 has a way less mega pixels resolution back camera and a lower video quality.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Blackview BL6000 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 76 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.