Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 71.8. The LG V40 ThinQ body is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a worse video definition and a camera in the back with a much worse resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ features a greater memory for applications and games than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Blackview BL6000 Pro features a way better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 60 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.