Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a lot better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 71.8. LG Velvet is a way lighter and much thinner cellphone than Blackview BL6000 Pro. The LG Velvet has a bit better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Velvet takes much clearer pictures and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality.
The LG Velvet features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Blackview BL6000 Pro features superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.