Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, with a global score of 87.1 against 71.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Blackview BL6000 Pro. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10, offering some additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger screen. The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Blackview BL6000 Pro has greater battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a more mega-pixels camera in the back and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.