Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, having a 77.6 score against 71.8. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Moto Z3 is a much thinner and much lighter phone than the Blackview BL6000 Pro.
The Moto Z3 has a little bit better looking display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each screen inch. The Moto Z3 has more memory to store more games and applications than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview BL6000 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.