Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, getting a global score of 83.8 against 71.8. Galaxy A50's construction is notably lighter and extremely thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit sharper display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a just a little better pixels number per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features just a little better hardware performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a way worse video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.