Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is notably lighter and a lot thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10, so it provides some extra features.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a better storage for games and applications than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of them have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video resolution and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.