Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's score of 71.8. Galaxy A52's design is notably lighter and noticeably thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little more vivid screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.