Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 71.8. Galaxy Fold is a notably thinner but just a bit heavier phone than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold and Blackview BL6000 Pro count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold captures clearer photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal storage.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.