Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, getting a score of 78.9 against 71.8. Both devices we are comparing come with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should give very similar OS features. The Galaxy M20 is a noticeably thinner and way lighter device than the Blackview BL6000 Pro.
The Galaxy M20 and Blackview BL6000 Pro feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy M20 has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels and a much better video resolution. Blackview BL6000 Pro features a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Blackview BL6000 Pro has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.