Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way thinner and notably lighter device than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a just a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more storage for games and applications than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a way higher video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Blackview BL6000 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.