Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's general score of 71.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is lighter and extremely thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better processing power than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and more pixels per screen inch.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Blackview BL6000 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5280mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a lot better video resolution and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.