Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, having a general score of 81.9 against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's construction is much thinner and lighter than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Galaxy S8 Active features a better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit more powerful processor than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Blackview BL6000 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. Blackview BL6000 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.