Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 score. Samsung Galaxy S9's body is extremely lighter and way thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit better processor than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a sharper display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a greater pixel quantity per display inch. The Galaxy S9 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower video definition and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 76 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.