Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than Blackview BL6000 Pro.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5280mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.