Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, with an 88.5 score against 71.8. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is way lighter and thinner than Blackview BL6000 Pro.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better looking screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Blackview BL6000 Pro count with very similar memory to install applications and games, both have exactly the same internal storage. The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better videos and photos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.