Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, having a 94.6 score against 71.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while Blackview BL6000 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a a little bit heavier but incredibly thinner phone than Blackview BL6000 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processing unit than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a lower video resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Blackview BL6000 Pro, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory.
Blackview BL6000 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5280mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.