Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's overall score of 71.9. Although iPhone XR is extremely older than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's body is noticeably thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Blackview BL8800 Pro has a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has much less brightness, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density, a bit larger screen and a better 1080 x 2408px resolution. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone XR takes clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has an 8380mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.