Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 71.9. The LG V35 ThinQ design is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater display pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 154% larger battery size. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.