Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11 version. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is extremely older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and much thinner.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better screen pixel density. The LG V40 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Blackview BL8800 Pro has a way better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 154 percent more battery capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.