Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 overall score. Despite of the fact that LG Velvet is older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is thinner and a lot lighter. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2408 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The LG Velvet has a much greater storage for games and applications than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity. LG Velvet takes a lot better photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a lower resolution back camera, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.